Development of a Teacher Curriculum Innovation Competency Framework to Support AI-Based Learning Transformation
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has created new opportunities for transforming teaching and learning, particularly in curriculum design, instructional delivery, and learning assessment. However, teachers may face challenges in integrating AI effectively because of differences in technological knowledge, pedagogical skills, curriculum innovation capabilities, and understanding of ethical AI use. This study aims to develop a Teacher Curriculum Innovation Competency Framework to support AI-based learning transformation. The research employs a Design and Development Research (DDR) approach, consisting of literature review, competency identification, framework design, and expert validation. Relevant literature on teacher digital competence, technological pedagogical knowledge, AI literacy, curriculum innovation, and responsible AI integration is analyzed to identify essential competency domains and indicators. The proposed framework comprises six dimensions: AI literacy and technological competence, curriculum design and innovation, AI-integrated pedagogical competence, assessment and learning analytics, ethical and responsible AI practice, and professional collaboration and continuous development. These dimensions are intended to provide a structured foundation for assessing teacher competencies and designing targeted professional development programs. The framework also emphasizes the importance of aligning AI applications with learning objectives, educational contexts, student needs, and ethical principles. However, the proposed framework requires further validation through expert evaluation and empirical testing before its effectiveness can be established. Future research should examine its validity, reliability, and applicability across educational levels and institutional settings. The framework is expected to support systematic teacher development and responsible AI-based learning transformation.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068.
Brown, M. W. (2002). Teaching by design: Understanding the intersection between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovations. Northwestern University.
Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. (2020). Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainability, 12(14), 5568.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Ding, C. S., & Hershberger, S. L. (2002). Assessing content validity and content equivalence using structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 283–297.
Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. Taylor & Francis.
Georgieva, M. (n.d.). Artificial Intelligence/Extended Reality Convergence: A Capacity-Building Framework for Instructional Integrity and Stewardship. In Adopting Virtual Reality in Inclusive Higher Education (pp. 351–394). Routledge.
Golder, S., Loke, Y. K., Wright, K., & Norman, G. (2016). Reporting of adverse events in published and unpublished studies of health care interventions: a systematic review. PLoS Medicine, 13(9), e1002127.
Hong, Y., Nguyen, A., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2022). Data ethics framework for artificial intelligence in education (AIED). 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 297–301.
Kim, S., Jang, Y., Choi, S., Kim, W., Jung, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Analyzing teacher competency with TPACK for K-12 AI education. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 139–151.
Learning, C. (2015). Teaching.
Lim, C., Hwang, Y., & Han, Y. (n.d.). Developing Teachers’ AI and Digital Competencies: Insights and Lessons Learned through the AIEDAP Project in Korea. In Transforming Teaching and Learning (pp. 186–202). Routledge.
Longhini, J., Rossettini, G., & Palese, A. (2022). Digital health competencies among health care professionals: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(8), e36414.
Manasia, L., Ianos, M. G., & Chicioreanu, T. D. (2019). Pre-service teacher preparedness for fostering education for sustainable development: An empirical analysis of central dimensions of teaching readiness. Sustainability, 12(1), 166.
Martens, D., Vanasten, S., Meurée, C., & Masschelein, A. (2014). The Literary Interview: Toward a Poetics of a Hybrid Genre. Poetics Today.
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence and education. Guidance for policy-makers.
Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI‐powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914–931.
Organization, W. H., Educational, U. N., Educational, U. N., Scientific, & Organization, C. (2021). Making every school a health-promoting school: Implementation guidance. World Health Organization.
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development.
Poquet, O., & De Laat, M. (2021). Developing capabilities: Lifelong learning in the age of AI. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1695–1708.
Schmidt, T., & Strasser, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence in foreign language learning and teaching: a CALL for intelligent practice. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 33(1), 165–184.
Tomczyk, L., & Fedeli, L. (2021). Digital Literacy among Teachers—Mapping Theoretical Frameworks: TPACK, DigCompEdu, UNESCO, NETS-T, DigiLit Leicester. In Proceedings of the 38th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA) (pp. 244–252). International Business Information Management Association.
Toom, A. (2017). Teachers’ professional and pedagogical competencies: A complex divide between teacher work, teacher knowledge and teacher education. The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 2, 803–819.
Watson, E. (2020). The slippery business of measuring beliefs: Lessons from a failed attempt at developing an instrument to measure teachers’ epistemic beliefs about physics knowledge. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 119–140.
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.