##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Farrukh Hawthorne
Muhammadjon Muhammadjon
Azadija Azadija

Abstract

Personalized learning requires curriculum approaches that can respond to differences in students' abilities, learning pace, engagement, and learning needs. However, conventional curricula often provide relatively uniform learning content, activities, pacing, and assessment, making continuous individual adaptation difficult. This study aimed to develop a Learning Analytics-Based Adaptive Curriculum Model to support personalized learning. The study employed a Research and Development/Design-Based Research approach involving students, teachers, and educational experts. Learning analytics data, including assessment performance, task completion, learning activity, engagement, learning pace, error patterns, and learning progress, were analyzed to develop student learning profiles and inform curriculum adaptation. The model was evaluated through expert validation, practicality testing, classroom implementation, and effectiveness assessment. The findings showed that distinct student learning profiles could be identified and translated into differentiated learning pathways involving remediation, standard learning, and enrichment. Expert evaluation indicated that the model was valid, while teacher and student responses demonstrated its practicality for instructional implementation. The implementation also showed positive changes in learning achievement, engagement, mastery, progress, and task completion. The study concludes that integrating learning analytics into curriculum decision-making can provide a systematic mechanism for connecting student learning evidence with adaptive curriculum responses and personalized learning. The model offers practical implications for teachers, curriculum developers, schools, and educational technology developers seeking to implement more responsive and data-informed learning environments.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Hawthorne, F., Muhammadjon, M., & Azadija, A. (2026). Development of a Learning Analytics-Based Adaptive Curriculum Model to Support Personalized Learning. Journal of Education Innovation and Curriculum Development, 4(1), 23–36. Retrieved from https://journals.iarn.or.id/index.php/educur/article/view/781
References
Ahmad Uzir, N., Gašević, D., Matcha, W., Jovanović, J., & Pardo, A. (2020). Analytics of time management strategies in a flipped classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 70–88.
Ainsworth, L. (2011). Rigorous curriculum design: How to create curricular units of study that align standards, instruction, and assessment. Lead+ Learn Press.
Ayub, E., Lim, C. L., Yeo, D. C. H., & Ismail, S. R. (2022). Developing a solution for hybrid classroom: A pilot study from a Malaysian private university. Frontiers in Education, 7, 841363.
Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education.
Blumenstein, M. (2020). Synergies of learning analytics and learning design: A systematic review of student outcomes. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(3), 13–32.
Buckingham Shum, S., & Crick, R. D. (2012). Learning dispositions and transferable competencies: pedagogy, modelling and learning analytics. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 92–101.
Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice: Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.
Donevska-Todorova, A., Dziergwa, K., & Simbeck, K. (2022). Individualizing Learning Pathways with Adaptive Learning Strategies: Design, Implementation and Scale. CSEDU (2), 575–585.
Gibbs, G. (2010). Using assessment to support student learning. Leeds Met Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s “Learning for Mastery.” Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8–31.
Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., & Hopf, M. (2020). Design-based research as a model for systematic curriculum development: The example of a curriculum for introductory optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 20152.
Hilliger, I., & Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (2022). Facing the change beyond COVID-19: Continuous curriculum improvement in higher education using learning analytics. In A research agenda for global higher education (pp. 193–209). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Karampiperis, P., & Sampson, D. (2005). Adaptive learning resources sequencing in educational hypermedia systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 128–147.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Mavroudi, A., Giannakos, M., & Krogstie, J. (2018). Supporting adaptive learning pathways through the use of learning analytics: developments, challenges and future opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 206–220.
Moral, S. V., & Crosseti, B. de-B. (2022). Self-regulation of learning and the co-design of personalized learning pathways in higher education: a theoretical model approach. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2022(1), 6.
Morgado, F. F. R., Meireles, J. F. F., Neves, C. M., Amaral, A. C. S., & Ferreira, M. E. C. (2017). Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 30(0), 3.
Pollitt, A. (2012). The method of adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(3), 281–300.
Ray, S., & Saeed, M. (2018). Applications of educational data mining and learning analytics tools in handling big data in higher education. In Applications of Big Data analytics: Trends, issues, and challenges (pp. 135–160). Springer.
Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement.
Shute, V. J., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education, 7(27), 1–35.
Sprenger, M. (2008). Differentiation through learning styles and memory. Corwin Press.
Tam, V., Patel, N., Turcotte, M., Bossé, Y., Paré, G., & Meyre, D. (2019). Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 20(8), 467–484.
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: AIEd for personalised learning pathways. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(5), 639–653.
Tempelaar, D. (2020). Supporting the less-adaptive student: The role of learning analytics, formative assessment and blended learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 579–593.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.
Winget, M., & Persky, A. M. (2022). A practical review of mastery learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10), ajpe8906.