##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Akello Daneil Otieno

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of the differentiated instruction learning model on academic achievement, engagement, and participation in inclusive classrooms. The study was conducted using an experimental approach involving both control and treatment groups drawn from inclusive class settings. The treatment group received instruction through differentiated strategies tailored to individual student readiness, learning styles, and interests, while the control group was taught using traditional methods. The results indicated that students in the differentiated instruction group demonstrated significantly higher academic performance, greater classroom engagement, and increased participation compared to those in the control group. These findings align with existing literature supporting the effectiveness of differentiated instruction, particularly in diverse learning environments. The study concludes that differentiated instruction is a powerful pedagogical tool in inclusive education, providing equitable learning opportunities and improving overall classroom dynamics. Educational implications suggest the need for systemic support, teacher training, and policy integration to effectively implement differentiated instruction in inclusive settings.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Otieno, A. D. (2025). Experimental Study on the Effect of Differentiated Instruction Learning Model on Inclusive Classrooms. Journal of Education Innovation and Curriculum Development, 3(1), 38–45. Retrieved from https://journals.iarn.or.id/index.php/educur/article/view/451
References
Ainscow, M., & Miles, S. (2008). Making education for all inclusive: Where next? Prospects, 38(1), 15–34.
Appleton, H., Roberts, J., & Simpson, K. (2019). How is anxiety identified and diagnosed in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability? A scoping review. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3–4), 152–175.
Arnone, M. P., Small, R. V, Chauncey, S. A., & McKenna, H. P. (2011). Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: A new research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 181–198.
Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(3), 277–293.
Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How does changing “one-size-fits-all” to differentiated instruction affect teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336–362.
Esbensen, F.-A., Melde, C., Taylor, T. J., & Peterson, D. (2008). Active parental consent in school-based research: how much is enough and how do we get it? Evaluation Review, 32(4), 335–362.
Hocine, N., & Sehaba, K. (2024). A systematic review of online personalized systems for the autonomous learning of people with cognitive disabilities. Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3–4), 174–205.
Langer, G. M., Colton, A. B., & Goff, L. S. (2003). Collaborative analysis of student work: Improving teaching and learning. ASCD.
May, H., & Bridger, K. (2010). Developing and embedding inclusive policy and practice in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy, 13.
Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2013). Re-engaging young people in education: Learning from alternative schools. Routledge.
Palincsar, A. S., Collins, K. M., Marano, N. L., & Magnusson, S. J. (2000). Investigating the engagement and learning of students with learning disabilities in guided inquiry science teaching. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(3), 240–251.
Polikoff, M. S., Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. (2011). How well aligned are state assessments of student achievement with state content standards? American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 965–995.
Roose, I., Vantieghem, W., Vanderlinde, R., & Van Avermaet, P. (2024). Professional vision as a mediator for inclusive education? Unravelling the interplay between teachers’ beliefs, professional vision and reported practice of differentiated instruction. Educational Review, 76(3), 483–505.
Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). Teacher educators’ perceptions and use of differentiated instruction practices: An exploratory investigation. Action in Teacher Education, 34(4), 309–327.
Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2366.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Ascd.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). Differentiated instruction. In Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 279–292). Routledge.
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145.
Waitoller, F. R., & Artiles, A. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 319–356.
Westwood, P. (2018). Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom. Routledge.