Analysis of the Application of Blockchain Technology in Learning Evaluation Systems in Higher Education
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This research explores the application of blockchain technology in learning evaluation systems within higher education, focusing on its potential to address issues such as data security, transparency, and trust in academic records. Blockchain offers a decentralized, tamper-proof platform for managing academic data, which can help mitigate challenges like fraud, cheating, and difficulty in tracking student progress. The study reviews existing literature on the use of blockchain in education, particularly in grading, credentialing, and the management of academic achievements. It also identifies the technical, operational, and institutional challenges involved in implementing blockchain, including high implementation costs, resistance to change, lack of expertise, and regulatory issues. The findings suggest that while blockchain presents significant advantages, including enhanced data security and improved trust among stakeholders, its adoption faces substantial barriers. These challenges require collaborative efforts from educational institutions, policymakers, and technology providers to overcome. Overall, the research concludes that blockchain has the potential to revolutionize learning evaluation systems, offering a more secure, efficient, and transparent approach to academic assessment and credentialing in higher education.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Alshahrani, M., Beloff, N., & White, M. (2016). Towards a blockchain-based smart certification system for higher education: an empirical study. Int. J. Com. Dig. Sys, 5(3).
Blandford, A. E. (2013). Semi-structured qualitative studies. Interaction Design Foundation.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rance, N. (2015). How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In The counselling and psychotherapy research handbook (pp. 183–197). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2019). CHE principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), 76–90.
Chakroun, B., & Keevy, J. (2018). Digital credentialing: implications for the recognition of learning across borders.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Performance Counts: Assessment Systems That Support High-Quality Learning. Council of Chief State School Officers.
Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Gallant, T. B. (2011). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do. John Wiley & Sons.
Dawson, P. (2020). Defending assessment security in a digital world: Preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge.
Effiong, M. E. (2020). A Framework for the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Academic Certificate-Verification Systems: A Case Study in Nigeria. MSc Thesis, Talinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Fischer, C., Pardos, Z. A., Baker, R. S., Williams, J. J., Smyth, P., Yu, R., Slater, S., Baker, R., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Mining big data in education: Affordances and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 130–160.
Flory, J., & Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. Jama, 292(13), 1593–1601.
Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. de, & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301.
Grech, A., & Mitha, A. (2018). Technology-enabled credentials for young people in Africa.
Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Misra, S. K., Rana, N. P., Raghavan, V., & Akella, V. (2019). Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 114–129.
Lizcano, D., Lara, J. A., White, B., & Aljawarneh, S. (2020). Blockchain-based approach to create a model of trust in open and ubiquitous higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32, 109–134.
Middaugh, M. F. (2011). Planning and assessment in higher education: Demonstrating institutional effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons.
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2016). Seven steps to a comprehensive literature review: A multimodal and cultural approach.
Peretti, K. K. (2008). Data breaches: What the underground world of" carding" reveals. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ, 25, 375.
Reeves, D. B. (2008). Assessing educational leaders: Evaluating performance for improved individual and organizational results. Corwin Press.
Sayed, R. H. (2019). Potential of blockchain technology to solve fake diploma problem.
Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Anderson, B., Barnett, B. M., Centeno, A., Naismith, L., Prideaux, D., Spencer, J., Tullo, E., & Viggiano, T. (2016). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 769–786.
Steiu, M.-F. (2020). Blockchain in education: Opportunities, applications, and challenges. First Monday.
Subashini, S., & Kavitha, V. (2011). A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(1), 1–11.
Tetlock, P. E., & Mitchell, G. (2009). Implicit bias and accountability systems: What must organizations do to prevent discrimination? Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 3–38.
Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (2011). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment in college. John Wiley & Sons.
Xie, J., Tang, H., Huang, T., Yu, F. R., Xie, R., Liu, J., & Liu, Y. (2019). A survey of blockchain technology applied to smart cities: Research issues and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(3), 2794–2830.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.