Carbon risk and corporate financial resilience in Indonesia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Empirical evidence linking carbon risk to corporate financial resilience largely comes from developed markets, leaving this relationship unexamined in emerging economies with still-developing carbon-regulatory regimes such as Indonesia’s. This study addresses that gap, examining whether and through which mechanisms carbon exposure shapes financial resilience when disclosure and carbon pricing remain incomplete. The contribution is conceptual: explaining how carbon exposure becomes financial vulnerability through transition-cost, financing, governance, and stakeholder-legitimacy mechanisms, rather than treating the Indonesian context as the source of novelty. The argument is tested on nonfinancial firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2021–2024, using panel data regression across 857 firm-year observations; financial resilience is captured via the Altman Z-score, and carbon risk through emission intensity relative to revenue. Findings show a significant negative association between carbon risk and financial resilience (β = -0.0365, p = 0.0492), along with significant associations for profitability (β = -5.5433, p = 0.0000) and leverage (β = -0.3339, p = 0.0000); the model explains 24 percent of the variation (adjusted R² = 0.2372). The study integrates Transition Risk, Agency, and Stakeholder/Legitimacy Theory into a single framework explaining why carbon exposure weakens financial resilience absent mandatory disclosure. These results underscore embedding environmental considerations into corporate financial strategy and risk management as emerging economies develop their sustainability regulations.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Ali, K., Nadeem, M., Pandey, R., & Bhabra, G. S. (2023). Do capital markets reward corporate climate change actions? Evidence from the cost of debt. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3417–3431. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3308
Anggereini, E., Aina, M., & Nainggolan, R. A. (2022). The Effect of Knowledge and Perceptions on the Prospect of Using Biofuel-Based Alternative Energy Sources. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 6(4), 629–636. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v6i4.50164
Aslan, C., Bulut, E., Cepni, O., & Yilmaz, M. H. (2022). Does climate change affect bank lending behavior? Economics Letters, 220, 110859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110859
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. T. (2019). Do Investors Care about Carbon Risk? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3398441
Chabot, M., & Bertrand, J.-L. (2023). Climate risks and financial stability: Evidence from the European financial system. Journal of Financial Stability, 69, 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101190
Chakrabarty, S. P., & Nag, S. (2023). Risk measures and portfolio analysis in the paradigm of climate finance: a review. SN Business & Economics, 3(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00449-w
Chen, X., Chen, W., Hu, T., Yang, B., & Zeng, J. (2023). Regional carbon efficiency and corporate cash holdings: evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 511. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01992-5
Chithambo, L., Tingbani, I., Agyapong, G. A., Gyapong, E., & Damoah, I. S. (2020). Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(4), 1666–1683. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2460

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.