Analyzing Bank Rakyat Indonesia's Financial Performance Using the CAMEL Method: Implications for Stability and Strategic Decisions in the Banking Industry
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Bank Rakyat Indonesia's (BRI) financial performance is evaluated using the CAMEL technique, a financial institution strength and stability framework. The report examines BRI's financial health, strengths, limitations, and effects on operations, stability, and strategy. The 2018–2022 study examines BRI's financial indicators. Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management Quality, Earnings, and Liquidity are assessed to determine the bank's performance in each category. The report shows BRI's strengths and shortcomings, stressing its strong capital adequacy, asset quality, and management. It also highlights loan portfolio diversification, concentration risks, and regulatory compliance issues as issues. BRI's conformity with or exceeding industry benchmarks solidifies its status as a strong and reliable financial institution. The findings highlight the bank's importance in economic stability and growth, affecting lending capacity, service offerings, and stakeholder confidence. The study concludes that BRI's financial performance affects its operations, stability, and strategic decisions. The bank's excellent financial position strengthens its resilience, shapes its growth ambitions, and boosts its financial sector credibility, benefiting Indonesia's economy. This research shows BRI's strengths, shortcomings, alignment with industry norms, and how its financial performance affects its operations and strategic decisions, emphasizing its financial health.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Akani, H. W., & Akani, V. (2018). Theoretical perspectives of earnings, profitability and asset quality in banking: Descriptive evidence from Nigeria economy. World Journal of Finance and Investment Research, 3(1), 1–24.
Berges, A., Guillén, M. F., Moreno, J. P., & Ontiveros, E. (2016). New Era in Banking: The Landscape After the Battle. Routledge.
Cull, R., Demirgu¨ ç‐Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2007). Financial performance and outreach: A global analysis of leading microbanks. The Economic Journal, 117(517), F107–F133.
Dang, U. (2011). The CAMEL rating system in banking supervision. A case study.
Dechow, P. M., & Schrand, C. M. (2004). Earnings quality. Research Foundation of CFA Institute Charlottesville, VA.
Flannery, M. J. (1998). Using market information in prudential bank supervision: A review of the US empirical evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 273–305.
Goodhart, C. (1988). The evolution of central banks. MIT press.
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 71–87.
Gup, B. E. (2011). Banking and financial institutions: A guide for directors, investors, and counterparties (Vol. 615). John Wiley & Sons.
Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley Jr, R. A., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231–252.
Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers.
Kinyua, J. M. (2016). Stakeholder Management Strategies and financial performance of deposit taking SACCOs in Kenya. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology.
Kongiri, A. T. (2012). Effects of CAMEL variables on bank efficiency: A panel analysis of Kenyan commercial banks.
La Porta, R., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The unofficial economy and economic development. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ledhem, M. A., & Mekidiche, M. (2020). Economic growth and financial performance of Islamic banks: a CAMELS approach. Islamic Economic Studies, 28(1), 47–62.
Lin, W., & Ai, Q. (2020). ‘Aerial Silk Roads’: Airport Infrastructures in China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Development and Change, 51(4), 1123–1145.
Loughlin, N., & Grimsditch, M. (2021). How local political economy dynamics are shaping the Belt and Road Initiative. Third World Quarterly, 42(10), 2334–2352.
Maurer, K. (1999). Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI), Indonesia (Case Study). Working Group on Savings Mobilization. Eschborn, Alemania: CGAP, 5–7.
Maurer, K., & Seibel, H. D. (2001). Agricultural Development Bank Reform: The Case of Unit Banking System of Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI). IFAD Rural Finance Working Paper No. B 5.
Mayes, D. G., & Stremmel, H. (2012). The effectiveness of capital adequacy measures in predicting bank distress. 2013 Financial Markets & Corporate Governance Conference.
Moudud-Ul-Huq, S. (2017). Performance of banking industry in Bangladesh: insights of CAMEL rating. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 4(02n03), 1750006.
Ruozi, R., Ferrari, P., Ruozi, R., & Ferrari, P. (2013). Liquidity risk management in banks: economic and regulatory issues. Springer.
Sapir, A., Aghion, P., Bertola, G., Hellwig, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Rosati, D., Viñals, J., Wallace, H., Buti, M., & Nava, M. (2004). An agenda for a growing Europe: The Sapir report. OUP Oxford.
Schulhof, V., van Vuuren, D., & Kirchherr, J. (2022). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): What will it look like in the future? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121306.
Van Greuning, H., & Bratanovic, S. B. (2020). Analyzing banking risk: a framework for assessing corporate governance and risk management. World Bank Publications.
Wachira, D. G. (2010). Relationship between financial performance and camel rating of commercial banks in Kenya. University of University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.