Enhancing Financial Governance: Compliance with Government Accounting Standards in Educational Institutions
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This research investigates the implementation of government accounting standards in educational institutions and its implications for financial governance within the education sector. Drawing upon a mixed-method approach, the study examines compliance levels, challenges, and influential factors shaping the adoption and adherence to accounting regulations among educational institutions. Findings reveal varying levels of compliance, with resource constraints, organizational complexity, limited accounting expertise, regulatory complexities, and resistance to change identified as key implementation challenges. Despite these obstacles, proactive strategies and collaborative efforts among stakeholders are essential for enhancing compliance, transparency, and accountability in financial management practices. The research underscores the importance of prioritizing compliance with government accounting standards to strengthen financial governance, build public trust, and better serve the needs of students and communities. By addressing implementation challenges and fostering a culture of accountability, educational institutions can fulfill their mission of providing quality education and contributing to societal progress.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Altbach, P. G., Gumport, P. J., & Berdahl, R. O. (2011). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges. Jhu Press.
Amaral, A., Jones, G., & Karseth, B. (2013). Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.
Avcı, Ö., Ring, E., & Mıtchell, L. (2015). Stakeholders in US higher education: An analysis through two theories of stakeholders. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 10(2).
Ball, R. (2001). Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2001(1), 127–169.
Boissiere, M. (2004). Determinants of primary education outcomes in developing countries. World Bank, Independent Evaluation Group (IEG), Washington, DC.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 2–14.
Brusca, I., & Martínez, J. C. (2016). Adopting International Public Sector Accounting Standards: a challenge for modernizing and harmonizing public sector accounting. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 724–744.
Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7–8), 565–596.
Chan, J. L. (2003). Government accounting: an assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Public Money & Management, 23(1), 13–20.
Christiaens, J., Vanhee, C., Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: An international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 158–177.
Deegan, C. (2014). An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, 248–272.
Goddard, J., & Puukka, J. (2008). The engagement of higher education institutions in regional development: An overview of the opportunities and challenges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(2), 11–41.
King, R. (2009). Governing universities globally: Organizations, regulation and rankings. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lapsley, I., & Pallot, J. (2000). Accounting, management and organizational change: A comparative study of local government. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 213–229.
Leventhal, H., & Cameron, L. (1987). Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Education and Counseling, 10(2), 117–138.
Máté, D., Sadaf, R., Oláh, J., Popp, J., & Szűcs, E. (2019). The effects of accountability, governance capital, and legal origin on reported frauds. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(6), 1213–1231.
Onuorah, A. C., & Appah, E. (2012). Accountability and public sector financial management in Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(6).
Owen, G. (2015). Integrated reporting: A review of developments and their implications for the accounting curriculum. Sustainability in Accounting Education, 43–59.
Pina, V., Torres, L., & Yetano, A. (2009). Accrual accounting in EU local governments: One method, several approaches. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 765–807.
Spekle, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146.
Van Slyke, D. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187.
Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 17–41.
Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. E. (2013). More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 441–488.
Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.