##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Marsia Adimani Ndruru

Abstract





The character of students in Class X Agribusiness of Food Crops and Horticulture of State Vocational High School 1 Hilimegai for ecosystem material was previously less active in learning Biology, this is indicated by the lack of student response to the subject matter, students tend to be passive in learning. This study aims to improve student learning activeness through the application of the Problem Based Learning learning model. This type of research is Classroom Action Research (PTK) which is carried out in two cycles. Each cycle consists of several stages, namely planning, action implementation, observation and reflection. The subjects in this study were students in Class X Agribusiness of Food Crops and Horticulture of State Vocational High School 1 Hilimegai in the 2022/2023 academic year consisting of 31 students. The main techniques in data collection were observation, questionnaire and documentation. The results showed that in cycle I the average percentage of student learning activeness was 74%. In cycle II, the percentage of student learning activeness was 85%. Based on the percentage data for each cycle, there was an increase in student learning activeness. The conclusion of this study is that the Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model can increase student learning activeness in ecosystem material in the X Agribusiness competency of food crops and horticulture at the State Vocational High School 1 hilimegai, 2022/2023 academic year.





##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Marsia Adimani Ndruru. (2023). The application of a problem-based learning model to increase student learning activeness on ecosystem material in class x agribusiness of food crops and horticulture at state vocational high school 1 hilimegai in the 2022/2023 academic year. Journal of Education Innovation and Curriculum Development, 1(3), 75–79. Retrieved from http://journals.iarn.or.id/index.php/educur/article/view/240
References
REFERENCES
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC.
Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569–590.
Chen, F., Looi, C., & Chen, W. (2009). Integrating technology in the classroom: a visual conceptualization of teachers’ knowledge, goals and beliefs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), 470–488.
Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28(3), 435–446.
Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active‐constructive‐interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105.
Davis, M. H., & Harden, R. M. (1999). AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 15: Problem-based learning: a practical guide. Medical Teacher, 21(2), 130–140.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. ALT-J, 3(2), 5–34.
Graham, A., Truscott, J., Simmons, C., Anderson, D., & Thomas, N. (2018). Exploring student participation across different arenas of school life. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1029–1046.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.
Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963–973.
Lestariningsih, D., Nurlaela, L., Mariono, A., & Harianto, G. P. (2021). The Effect of the Problem-Based Learning Model on Learning Outcomes in the Course of Learning Strategy at Sttiaa Pacet Mojokerto. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(6), 990–1011.
Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., Jorge, L. R., Kollmann, J., Overbeck, G. E., Prado, P. I., Pillar, V. D., & Popp, D. (2015). Ecological literacy and beyond: Problem-based learning for future professionals. Ambio, 44, 154–162.
Mertler, C. A. (2009). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Sage.
Metin, Ş. (2017). Investigation of the practices in learning centers of pre-school education institutes. Turkish Journal of Education, 6(1), 1–16.
Oberst, U., Gallifa, J., Farriols, N., & Vilaregut, A. (2009). Training emotional and social competences in higher education: The seminar methodology. Higher Education in Europe, 34(3–4), 523–533.
Purwanto, M. B. (2022). THE EFFICACY OF LEARNING COMMUNITY IN LEARNING ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL. Language and Education, 7(2).
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9(2), 5–15.
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem‐based learning: what works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806.